Bumps on profile cuts

[asteude]

I am using a 1/2" diameter, 2.5" cutting length straight bit to cut a guitar body with lots of 2D curves on 2" deep profiles (in four passes.) For now, I'm using MDF for prototyping. I need to eliminate the need to shape the part after cutting so the customer really just needs to sand down the roughness of the grain. However, whenever I cut the part, I get very noticeable bumps. I've correlated these to several factors:

1. I consistently get a bump where the circular lead ins meet the cutting line
2. There are bumps on either end of a zig-zag ramp lead in
3. Where the part gets close enough to the edge of the material that the bit cuts through the edge, there's a noticeable bump.
4. I think I can even attribute one bump to a ramped tab.

I think I can probably eliminate most of this by using spiral ramps and steering clear of the material edge. I won't be able to do away with tabs, but I'm not 100% sure about the tabs causing the bumps anyway.

I'm wondering though, should the spindle have that much play that a bit will move by ~1/16" based on what I would consider normal cutting forces?

Are there other factors at play that I can tweak to improve the smoothness of the cuts?

Thanks a lot!
Andy

[CNYDWW]

This sounds like a deflection issue. Which direction are you cutting? Climb? Conventional? I would try climb milling with a .0625 offset and leaving an onion skin on the bottom of the part and popping a starter hole all the way through for a flush trim bit to release it. Since it'll be ash you're milling, i would mill across the end grain at the neck and any other sharp corners in the design. Same technique you would use if using a hand router on the edges of a board. Across the end grain first then the sides. This helps avoid chips and tearout. Once that's done i would repeat the process at full depth of cut in conventional. If you use a lead in of .0625 to the final profile taking off that excess left behind, the bit wouldn't need a ramp plunge. It would simple plunge where the material has already been milled. The big difference here is where that bit deflects. When cutting in the climb direction (clockwise around the part). The bit would normally deflect away from it. With conventional dirrection (counter clockwise). It deflects into the part. Considering that you'll only be taking off 1/16" of material, the deflection on the final pass would be minimal.

Regards
Randy

[asteude]

Thanks, Randy! I'm reading into your post that the flaws should be expected and are normal with the approach I used.

I was cutting "conventional" (counterclockwise on outside cuts.)

I'll give the "sneak up on it" and onion skin approach a shot.

Do you think I should still cut the .0625" final cut in passes? It seems to me that it'd be cleaner just to cut the full 2" depth in one shot.

Thanks a lot for sharing your expertise!

Andy

[CNYDWW]

Probably easily missed but yes, final cut down to full dept minus the onion skin. You shouldn't have to step that cut.

When you run for first stepped cut, pause for a min and take a look to see if there is any deflection into the material at all. If there isn't you can cut the offset to less then a 1/16th or if brave, no offset at all. If the issues continue then there may be other things you'll have to look at.

Regards
Randy

[bobmoore]

Andy; I will often cut hardwood as outlined by Randy's excellent advise. I usually program the conventional cut in one pass on the same vector as the climb cuts with hardwood. Easier to program, and the the conventional cut just cleans up the material left from the climb cut bit deflection. Also make sure to extend your final cut well past the start point and ramp out. (up to .5")
Bob

[asteude]

Randy, Bob -

Wow... It's amazing what you miss when you read things too quickly and before the coffee's had a chance to kick in. Like, the whole point of the post.

Thanks for the great tip! I'll give it a shot.

Andy