Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 14 of 14

Thread: fine tuning tool paths for production

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    453

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ajcoholic View Post
    What about a stronger vacuum? Wouldn't that allow the same fast cutting without moving? Not slowing down at all = less time = more $$
    It might help, but they are ski cores which are long and narrow, so the holding force in the cross grain direction is compromised by the shape of the blank.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    453

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by adrianm View Post
    If the parts do have arcs the speed change could be made via Aspire as well as the Post Processor has a separate section for arc moves.
    That's a great idea, however, the sidecut of the ski is a large circular arc as well. It could be broken into line segments, but still not the ideal solution.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Pasadena, CA
    Posts
    986

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by donek View Post
    It might help, but they are ski cores which are long and narrow, so the holding force in the cross grain direction is compromised by the shape of the blank.
    How about a custom shape long and narrow vac pod? It could even have fences or dowel stops to prevent the blanks from moving. After all, the surface area of that ski core should give you over 1000 pounds of holding force at high vacuum (e.g. > 20" Hg). Would also allow running at very modest electrical power.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    453

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by adrianm View Post
    If the parts do have arcs the speed change could be made via Aspire as well as the Post Processor has a separate section for arc moves.
    Quote Originally Posted by Burkhardt View Post
    How about a custom shape long and narrow vac pod? It could even have fences or dowel stops to prevent the blanks from moving. After all, the surface area of that ski core should give you over 1000 pounds of holding force at high vacuum (e.g. > 20" Hg). Would also allow running at very modest electrical power.
    That's not a bad idea. Perhaps we'll use it next season.

Similar Threads

  1. nested tool paths?
    By Kyle Stapleton in forum Techniques for Cutting, Drilling, Machining
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 04-03-2014, 04:38 PM
  2. Tool paths
    By matney_models in forum ShopBotter Message Board
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 07-12-2010, 09:46 AM
  3. Fine tuning Ramping
    By sheldon@dingwallguitars.com in forum Archives2005
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 02-03-2005, 04:30 AM
  4. Fine tuning a Colombo (ramping)
    By stargategfx in forum Archives2004
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 07-21-2004, 01:46 PM
  5. Tool Paths?
    By jimmythethief in forum Archives 2003
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 09-23-2003, 02:03 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •