Harold.. your star looks terrific. That does not mean it proves the problem I am speaking of does not exist.
Imagine what would have happened in the star had you used my hypothetical one inch end mill? The problem would become very clear in both the internal and external points of the star.
What happens is: in the female corners there is an area the end mill cannot reach to clear. The size of area that is not cleared is dependent on the angle of the sides in the case of the star, and the diameter of the end mill used. Same thing in the male pattern.
Now imagine lots of convex and concave detail nearby each other (within a bit-diameter), such as would happen in a photo. Now the uncleared area in the male can overlap the uncleared area in the female half, and now a real interference exists that will likely show in the final piece.
It is not always "automatically" perfect. It is normally very good, and the issue is usually hidden.
The method is wonderful, but there is something to watch out for, and artwork correction can overcome it.
I am particularly grateful for Paul's developing and sharing the method, which works "almost" perfectly.
General solution: use a small end mill and ignore the issue. Slightly better solution.. adjust the artwork for the mill size being used.
D