This thread continued from here where the recent posts were:
Gerald_D Posted on Monday, July 11, 2005 - 2:51 am:
Where are our non-standard table-builders these days? Mike, after having used your table for two months, do you think that you would build your next table any differently? Heavier, lighter, etc.?
__________________________________________________ _________________________________
Mike John Posted on Monday, July 11, 2005 - 5:44 am:
Gerald
I would keep the dimensions the same, but move the cross pieces (and legs) towards the x zero end of the x beams so that the centre of the middle cross piece is directly under the bit when the x and y carriages are exactly in the middle of there travel. The table then overlaps the end crossbeams equally at each end.
I would also like to find a way of getting rid of the lower y cross strut at the zero end, in order to have a trolley loaded with sheet material that can be slid under or pulled out from there when needed.
I like my heavy x beams and me heavy legs, but I don't know if they are in fact any more stable than lighter material.
I like the legs being welded under the x beams, rather than bolted and protruding into the work area.
There is a message elswhere today about the building of a wooden table.
Again, with no experience I can not offer any real opinion, but I do feel that a metal table has the edge over wood.
And next time it is going to be Barbie Pink!
...............Mike
__________________________________________________ _________________________________
Gerald_D Posted on Monday, July 11, 2005 - 6:34 am:
Mike, if you screw the feet to the floor, you can take out those lower cross-members.
Positioning the table crosspieces depends whether you have a single or double z-slide, or whether the single slide is in the center of the y-car. (We have put our single z-slide as near to the y-motor as possible, to put minimum "racking" stress on the y-car.) But you can always add another crosspiece at the x=0 end - maybe box-section so that it is easier for a g-clamp? Anyway, my cross-piece spacing proposal was based on a 96" long table surface and is already slightly stretched from the standard SB table plans. I guess the message to prospective table builders is to check whether they are happy with the crosspiece positions.
After enough pink gins any colour will do.
BTW, our bundle of cables hangs off the center crosspiece, about 6-8" in from the end. That is why a center leg will not work for us - it will chafe the cables too much.
__________________________________________________ _________________________________
John Hesp Posted on Monday, July 11, 2005 - 7:19 am:
I would change my design (see higher up this thread) in the following ways:
i)....Centralise the surface with the tool, not the table (as Mike pointed out). This has caused me occassional problems with the tool hitting the limit switch before the tool has reached the end of the surface.
ii)...Make the surface is bigger in all directions so that the dust extractor skirt is always over surface. At present when skirt gets to edge of surface it stops working properly. I can do these two things when I resurface.
iii)..My under table storage is useful, but if I had a larger workshop with a flat floor it would have been better to have all this shelving on a wheel out trolley.
iv)...I would put the legs at the end of the table, not set back a foot. Those protruding ends of the X rails are too easy to crack your head on.
v)....I might mount the control box away from the table, but again, this would depend on available space.
vi)...I spent an awful lot of time thinking that getting the X track straight would be difficult. I was worried that my channel sections wouldn't be straight - they were straighter than I expected, but I still had a game getting the tracks straightish. It might have been better to use the idea I did toy with of having them mounted on adjustable bolts.
It would be good if the SB came with a straight edge of suitable length and accuracy for setting up.
John
__________________________________________________ _________________________________
Bill Palumbo Posted on Monday, July 11, 2005 - 12:06 pm:
I'm in the process of helping to assemble a VERY beefy wooden table out here in San Rafael, CA at the moment. Luckily the new owners of this Shopbot (PRT 48 by 120) have a very well equipped cabinet shop, and every piece has been thought through carefully before being added to the mix. Each piece is braced in multiple directions, and it's probably oversized, but as we all know, that's a good thing. I will have pix to post when i get back to my shop next week. Can't do them from here as I'm typing this out on a Mac, and their shop isn't connected to the internet yet..
__________________________________________________ _________________________________
Mike John Posted on Monday, July 11, 2005 - 12:27 pm:
Bill
As I said in another post, I was looking at some laminated beams 2 days ago.
These could be well stable enough for a table.
Look forward to seeing the pics, also interested of the experiences of wooden table owners.
................Mike
__________________________________________________ _________________________________
Jim Frost Posted on Tuesday, July 12, 2005 - 10:44 pm:
Mike,
I'm Coming up on the first aniversary of operating with wood table. I surfaced only a 1 square meter corner initially, since we would "Never do something big" then realised that demand was different than expectation. The full surface has been leveled once, about 6 months ago when the temperature outside was -20 F and the humidity near zero. Surfacing has held up well, although I expect it needs to be redone with the summer humidity, but I'll wait for the next big project unless I see issues with small things.
The table shook pretty badly with the early SW releases and I bought some 2x6 to stiffen. But later SW seems to work well without table changes, so I never installed the additional bracing. Next plans are to replace the 2x8 X rail supports with laminated beams as part of an upgrade to reposition the X axis and add a dovetail/boxjoint vertical table. When I get the time.
Initially I was amazed at what the tool could do that I couldn't. Now I find myself asking "How can I do it better" As I get more critical, the wood table may be an issue; not yet.
Jim
__________________________________________________ _________________________________
Mike John Posted on Tuesday, July 12, 2005 - 11:51 pm:
Jim
I remember when considering a wood or metal table thinking how good a table I could make if I could use the ShopBot
Gerald, time for part 3 of this thread?
.................Mike
__________________________________________________ _________________________________
Mike Enright Posted on Wednesday, July 13, 2005 - 7:19 am:
Mike
I built my wood table using the CNC at work. All laminated beams straightened and mortised on the CNC. It's only a month old but everything seems to be working beautifully.
Mike
__________________________________________________ _________________________________