PDA

View Full Version : Rest machining/tapered ball nose end mill



Chuck Keysor
06-05-2014, 02:39 PM
Hello Shopbot Friends:

I am making a match pair of carved wooden decorations for the outside of a house, the Aspire model is the first attachment. I simulated roughing and first finish passes with no problem. Then I used "Rest" machining to go and clean up all the detailed areas. I first simulated the "Rest" machining with a generic 1/16" ball nose end mill. The simulation turned out as I expected, OK.....

BUT, I said wait, I do NOT have a 1/16" ball nose end mill. I have a 1/16" TAPERED ball nose end mill (Amana 46282). I had better update my tool library. The closest thing I could find in the Aspire tool library was an engraving bit, so I used that, entering the included angle of 5.4 degrees, tip diameter of 1/16", and main shaft diameter 1/4". The only thing wrong was the real bit has a radiused end, but the model shows a flat. I said, gee, what difference will that make?

I edited my existing "Rest" machining tool path to switch in the new model for my Amana tapered ball nose end mill, and created a total disaster. The hoped for little bit of surface clean up instead ripped deep grooves into my part in the tool path simulation. :( See the second attachment.

I am supposed to cut a demo version of the attached applique by Saturday. I thought I was all set. Can I model my Amana tapered ball nose end mill in some way to avoid this problem? What do I do???? Or has something else gone wrong?

Thanks in advance, Chuck

adrianm
06-05-2014, 03:33 PM
Aspire supports tapered ball noses. Click New in the Tool Database and select Tapered Ball Nose from the Tool Type dropdown.

Joe Porter
06-05-2014, 03:33 PM
Chuck, if you go to the tool list and down at the bottom you can select "New" and then a drop down list will come up with a "Tapered Ball Nose" option and you can go from there...joe

ssflyer
06-05-2014, 03:48 PM
Hi Chuck,

Adrian and Joe have it right - unfortunately, you probably wouldn't have seen much difference, if you simply used your tapered ball nose, with the existing ball nose settings.

Brady Watson
06-05-2014, 04:12 PM
Just 3D Rough that puppy out & keep the boundary vector constrained so that the 1/16" ball doesn't 'fall off the edge' of the top. Successive TP simulations will tell you where to adjust the boundary vector via node editing - then re-toolpath. Then just toolpath it with a 1/16" ball (raster) and do a 2D cutout.

I would be willing to bet that it would not take much longer to rough out & finish with the 1/16" ball than it would to get involved with rest machining, since it has a tendency to hop around a lot & eat up a lot of time. It is very rare I rest machine anymore...it's not that efficient in the real world & that part is pretty straightforward.

-B

Chuck Keysor
06-05-2014, 10:41 PM
Thank you Adrian, Joe, Ron and Brady.

a) Thanks for the guidance to the tapered ball nose end mill template! But Ron, you were right, I didn't see any difference.

b) I must have messed up something else when I switched from the standard ball nose end mill to using the engraving bit, because the both bits simulate as cutting through my work piece. I went back and tried using the standard ball nose end mill, which did work, and this time it didn't.

c) I decided to simply jump to Brady's elegant solution of eliminating the rest milling, and did all of my finishing with the 1/16th tapered ball nose end mill. That simulated without problem. I would NEVER have EVER guessed to use a 1/16th in bit for doing all of that finishing, but it fulfills the old saying that the best solutions are the simplest solutions. (Is that Achem's Razor?)

Thanks again! Chuck

Joe Porter
06-06-2014, 08:34 AM
I think this may apply to this situation..While at the last Aspire Camp at McGrew's, Tim Merrill showed an example of doing a finish cut with the regular .125" ball nose and chose a toolpath color to show up on the finished piece. Then, to see of Rest Machining would be of any advantage, he figured another toolpath with a 1/16" ball nose a chose a contrasting toolpath color to show up on top of the original. This would show if the Rest Machining would be worthwhile. I think he concluded that this would show him which size ball nose bit to use in the original cut, instead of using the Rest Machine strategy at all...joe